It wasn't just that this article was offensive to men who stay at home, but it was just wrong. It took research on unemployed men and quite literally swapped out the term "unemployed men" with "stay at home dads."
The unemployed men weren't necessarily fathers at all, even if they were no one knows if they were "stay at home dads" simply because they were unemployed and lastly, most of the stay at home dads I know are not unemployed.
After confirming the article was in fact incorrect he started contacting Time and the author. Originally the author stood by her article.
So Al talked to Dr. Aaron Rochlen (who happens to be keynote speaker for the At-Home Dads Convention) and he confirmed that the author was mistaken. He also knew Liana Sayer, the author of the research the article was based on. She too confirmed that the Time reporter was incorrect in the way she characterized the study and it had nothing to do with at-home dads.
So eventually Time and the author changed the article to Unemployed Men Are More Likely to Divorce.
So the question is, who cares? Why spend all that time and energy to get one article on one web site changed? Who the hell actually reads Time?
Because the media matters. What the media says and does effects how people perceive things.
Don't think that is true? People still use the term Mr. Mom. Come on. That movie was 1983, was no cinema classic, and it is still a lot of people's go to term for at-home dads.
And the Time article itself was repeated across the web. A lot of smaller web sites picked it up and repeated Time's misinformation.
And through the work of Daddyshome and Al Watts in particular the misinformation is starting to be corrected.
So yes, it matters what the media says. It matters when Time gets it wrong.
I am proud to be part of an organization that is working to set the record straight. And I am proud to call Al, not just Mr President, but friend as well.